250-Unit California ATM Portfolio, 15-Year Remotely Managed Network

$590K

SDE

3.3x

Multiple

Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a 250-terminal ATM portfolio with a roughly 15-year operating history, spread across California with a concentration in the San Francisco Bay Area. The business earns money the way all ATM routes do: through surcharge fees collected each time a cardholder withdraws cash at one of its machines. Cash replenishment, servicing, maintenance, and field support are all handled by third-party providers, which means the owner is not personally loading machines or driving a route. Two full-time employees handle operational oversight and portfolio management.

The economics here are simple and durable. Reported annual cash flow is $590,130 against an asking price of $1,972,805, a 3.34x multiple. The moat, such as it is, comes from established merchant placements, machine uptime, dependable cash availability, and the length of time terminals have sat in profitable locations. With 250 machines across a fragmented California market, no single merchant, terminal, or micro-geography should make or break the portfolio.

The sellers are retiring after 15 years and are offering 90 days of transition support, with existing vendor and loading relationships expected to transfer at closing. This is positioned less as a route to grind and more as a semi-passive cash-flowing asset for an existing ATM operator or a yield-focused investor. Growth levers exist (surcharge pricing, replacing underperformers, adding units through current merchants) but the core pitch is stable, hands-off cash flow.

Why we like it

Earnings quality is straightforward and countable: $590,130 in annual cash flow at a 3.34x multiple, with revenue driven by high-frequency surcharge fees rather than lumpy contracts. Because the money literally flows through the machines and processor statements, this is one of the more verifiable SDE claims you will see in an SMB listing.
The moat is diversification and incumbency. With 250 terminals installed across California, the portfolio does not live or die on any one merchant, and machines that have sat in profitable locations for years carry real switching inertia. In a fragmented market of independent route owners, a 250-unit base is a meaningful scale advantage.
ATM cash withdrawals are recession-resilient demand. People pull cash regardless of the economy, and cash usage actually tends to hold up or rise during downturns and financial stress. This is not discretionary consumer spend, it is basic transaction infrastructure.
The operator advantage is that it is already structured for remote ownership. Third parties handle loading, servicing, and maintenance, and two employees run oversight, so a buyer inherits systems and vendor relationships rather than a route to physically drive. That makes it a clean bolt-on for an existing ATM operator or a genuinely semi-passive hold for a capital allocator.

How to improve it

Audit surcharge pricing across all 250 terminals in the first 90 days. Surcharge fees have room in most California markets, and even a small per-transaction increase across a high-volume base flows almost entirely to the bottom line. Identify the highest-traffic locations and test upward pricing where the merchant relationship supports it.
Rank every terminal by monthly transaction count and cash flow, then cull or relocate the bottom decile. Dead or low-volume machines still incur servicing, loading, and armored-carrier costs, so pruning underperformers and redeploying those units into stronger foot-traffic locations improves blended unit economics.
Renegotiate the third-party loading, servicing, and armored-cash contracts at scale. A 250-unit portfolio has real vendor leverage, and consolidating providers or rebidding routes can compress the single largest recurring cost line. The listing explicitly flags cost negotiation as untapped upside.
Add terminals through existing merchant relationships before chasing new placements. The current merchants already trust the operator, and incremental units drop onto existing servicing infrastructure without building a new operating system. This is the cheapest customer acquisition available in the business.
Upgrade aging terminals to EMV-compliant, higher-uptime hardware where the payback math works. Older machines mean more downtime, more service calls, and lost surcharge revenue, so a targeted capex refresh on the worst offenders can lift both revenue and reliability.
Build a real-time uptime and cash-level monitoring dashboard tied to the processor feed. Downtime and empty machines are pure lost revenue in this model, so tighter monitoring plus faster loader dispatch directly recovers dollars that are currently leaking.

Diligence notes

Verify the $590,130 cash flow against 24 to 36 months of processor settlement statements, not seller spreadsheets. Reconcile gross surcharge revenue, interchange, and all costs (cash cost of funds, armored carrier, servicing, processor fees, merchant rent shares) to confirm the number is true net owner cash flow and not gross margin dressed up.
Confirm merchant placement agreements and their transferability. Understand how many locations are under written contracts versus handshake arrangements, what the surcharge split with merchants looks like, and whether any anchor locations represent outsized concentration despite the 250-unit count.
Scrutinize the cash logistics and float. Determine who fronts the vault cash in each machine, the cost of that capital, and whether the buyer must supply working capital to keep 250 terminals loaded. This is often the hidden capital drag in ATM deals and can materially change the real return.
Assess terminal age, EMV/ADA compliance, and near-term replacement capex. A 15-year-old portfolio likely has machines nearing end of life, so quantify the deferred capital expenditure required over the next few years and whether it is embedded in the cash flow figure or a coming hit.
Confirm the durability and pricing of the third-party loader and servicing relationships that make this passive. Since the entire remote-ownership thesis depends on these vendors, verify they transfer at closing, understand their contract terms and renewal risk, and stress-test what happens to margins if a key provider raises rates.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →